<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177012</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the Assessing Officer to delete penalties imposed under sections 271E and 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that payments made through journal entries did not violate the relevant sections (269T and 269SS). Previous tribunal decisions supporting this interpretation led to the deletion of the penalties amounting to Rs. 5,29,83,400 under section 271E and Rs. 3,45,13,627 under section 271D for the assessment year 2005-06.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177012</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the Assessing Officer to delete penalties imposed under sections 271E and 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that payments made through journal entries did not violate the relevant sections (269T and 269SS). Previous tribunal decisions supporting this interpretation led to the deletion of the penalties amounting to Rs. 5,29,83,400 under section 271E and Rs. 3,45,13,627 under section 271D for the assessment year 2005-06.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>