<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 935 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay of 355 days in filing the appeal before the CIT (A) for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal emphasized that technical limitations should not hinder justice when the assessee has a strong case on merits. The order of the CIT (A) was set aside, and the delay was condoned, directing the CIT (A) to consider the appeal on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 13:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 935 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay of 355 days in filing the appeal before the CIT (A) for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal emphasized that technical limitations should not hinder justice when the assessee has a strong case on merits. The order of the CIT (A) was set aside, and the delay was condoned, directing the CIT (A) to consider the appeal on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>