<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 938 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177004</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled that penalties under section 271(1)(c) were unwarranted as the assessee had made proper disclosures and the discrepancies in cost estimates were due to differing expert opinions. The penalties imposed by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) were overturned, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were successful. The decision was issued on 19/07/2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 938 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177004</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled that penalties under section 271(1)(c) were unwarranted as the assessee had made proper disclosures and the discrepancies in cost estimates were due to differing expert opinions. The penalties imposed by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) were overturned, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were successful. The decision was issued on 19/07/2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>