<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s findings sustaining additions for unexplained sources and household expenses were treated as factual determinations unsupported by any showing of perversity or warranting interference. As the assessee had not satisfactorily explained the source of the amount in question and the household expense addition was found justified, no question of law arose for reference. The referred questions were therefore returned unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s findings sustaining additions for unexplained sources and household expenses were treated as factual determinations unsupported by any showing of perversity or warranting interference. As the assessee had not satisfactorily explained the source of the amount in question and the household expense addition was found justified, no question of law arose for reference. The referred questions were therefore returned unanswered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>