<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 933 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176999</link>
    <description>The civil appeals in this central excise matter were dismissed for delay, so the Court did not examine the substantive dispute. The operative effect is limited to dismissal on limitation grounds, leaving no determination on the underlying excise issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 12:47:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 933 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176999</link>
      <description>The civil appeals in this central excise matter were dismissed for delay, so the Court did not examine the substantive dispute. The operative effect is limited to dismissal on limitation grounds, leaving no determination on the underlying excise issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>