https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176998 The Supreme Court upheld the removal of the appellant from service, deeming the punishment proportionate to the misconduct despite the appellant's whistleblower claim. The appellant's admission of unauthorized communication and criticism led to the finding of misconduct, with the Court emphasizing the lack of whistleblower criteria. The Court found the disciplinary proceedings fair, rejecting claims of coercion and emphasizing the need for confidentiality in sensitive organizations. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the punishment's justification and the appellant's failure to meet whistleblower standards. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176998 The Supreme Court upheld the removal of the appellant from service, deeming the punishment proportionate to the misconduct despite the appellant's whistleblower claim. The appellant's admission of unauthorized communication and criticism led to the finding of misconduct, with the Court emphasizing the lack of whistleblower criteria. The Court found the disciplinary proceedings fair, rejecting claims of coercion and emphasizing the need for confidentiality in sensitive organizations. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the punishment's justification and the appellant's failure to meet whistleblower standards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176998