<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1110 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was based on the prompt settlement of dues by M/s. Sadbhavana Enterprises, leading to the conclusion that proceedings against the appellant should also end. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1110 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was based on the prompt settlement of dues by M/s. Sadbhavana Enterprises, leading to the conclusion that proceedings against the appellant should also end. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>