<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176979</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to restrict disallowance under section 14A to actual dividend income received. The membership fee was treated as capital expenditure but allowed for depreciation. The ITAT upheld the credit of TDS as directed by the Ld. CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, aligning with legal precedents and provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176979</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to restrict disallowance under section 14A to actual dividend income received. The membership fee was treated as capital expenditure but allowed for depreciation. The ITAT upheld the credit of TDS as directed by the Ld. CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, aligning with legal precedents and provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>