<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176985</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed three appeals where the revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the treatment of Fringe Benefits under the Income Tax Act for M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. The Court held that the questions raised did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the issue in accordance with the law. Consequently, all three appeals were dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176985</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed three appeals where the revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the treatment of Fringe Benefits under the Income Tax Act for M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. The Court held that the questions raised did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the issue in accordance with the law. Consequently, all three appeals were dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>