<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 103 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1756</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on a certified photocopy of the triplicate invoice because the inputs were received and used in manufacture, and the supplier&#039;s Range Superintendent verified the invoice particulars and duty payment. The assessee had also intimated the department about the loss of the original and duplicate copies. On these verified facts, credit could not be denied solely for reliance on a photocopy where documentary evidence established receipt of duty-paid inputs, and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 103 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1756</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on a certified photocopy of the triplicate invoice because the inputs were received and used in manufacture, and the supplier&#039;s Range Superintendent verified the invoice particulars and duty payment. The assessee had also intimated the department about the loss of the original and duplicate copies. On these verified facts, credit could not be denied solely for reliance on a photocopy where documentary evidence established receipt of duty-paid inputs, and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>