<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty for Long Term Capital Gain but confirmed the penalty for gifts received under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, based on legal precedents. Both the Revenue and the assessee&#039;s appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty for Long Term Capital Gain but confirmed the penalty for gifts received under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, based on legal precedents. Both the Revenue and the assessee&#039;s appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>