<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 39 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270247</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee in ITA.No.844/Hyd/2015 was dismissed by the ITAT due to insufficient explanations for the delay in filing appeals against penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) and section 271D of the I.T. Act, 1961. However, ITA.Nos.845 &amp;amp; 846/Hyd/2015 were treated as allowed for statistical purposes as the assessee did not actively challenge the re-assessment and penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:47:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 39 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270247</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee in ITA.No.844/Hyd/2015 was dismissed by the ITAT due to insufficient explanations for the delay in filing appeals against penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) and section 271D of the I.T. Act, 1961. However, ITA.Nos.845 &amp;amp; 846/Hyd/2015 were treated as allowed for statistical purposes as the assessee did not actively challenge the re-assessment and penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>