<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 36 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270244</link>
    <description>A partnership firm registered in the UK was considered entitled to the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement because treaty coverage was extended to persons resident in one or both contracting states, and a firm could fall within that framework where domestic law treats it as a person liable to tax. The analysis relied on the Income-tax Act definition of &quot;person&quot; and the fact that a firm is treated as an assessee for charge purposes, so treaty protection could not be denied merely because the firm was not taxed as a separate entity under UK domestic law. On that basis, the receipts were treated as not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 36 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270244</link>
      <description>A partnership firm registered in the UK was considered entitled to the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement because treaty coverage was extended to persons resident in one or both contracting states, and a firm could fall within that framework where domestic law treats it as a person liable to tax. The analysis relied on the Income-tax Act definition of &quot;person&quot; and the fact that a firm is treated as an assessee for charge purposes, so treaty protection could not be denied merely because the firm was not taxed as a separate entity under UK domestic law. On that basis, the receipts were treated as not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>