<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 34 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270242</link>
    <description>Consideration for access to internet, email and networking facilities through an embedded software-based gateway was treated as royalty because the payment was for use of a facility built around secret software, not a mere passive connectivity service. Applying the India-USA DTAA definition, the Tribunal held that the arrangement involved consideration for the use of, or the right to use, a secret formula, process or similar intellectual property. The transponder ruling was distinguished on facts, while the advance ruling on centralized computer systems and secret software was followed. The receipt was taxable in India as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 34 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270242</link>
      <description>Consideration for access to internet, email and networking facilities through an embedded software-based gateway was treated as royalty because the payment was for use of a facility built around secret software, not a mere passive connectivity service. Applying the India-USA DTAA definition, the Tribunal held that the arrangement involved consideration for the use of, or the right to use, a secret formula, process or similar intellectual property. The transponder ruling was distinguished on facts, while the advance ruling on centralized computer systems and secret software was followed. The receipt was taxable in India as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>