<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 24 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270232</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on capital goods and services in Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir. However, the appeal was allowed concerning the eligibility of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 72,66,850/- availed on documents. The tribunal upheld the extended period for demanding duty and imposing a penalty, rejecting the appellant&#039;s plea for relief under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 24 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270232</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on capital goods and services in Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir. However, the appeal was allowed concerning the eligibility of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 72,66,850/- availed on documents. The tribunal upheld the extended period for demanding duty and imposing a penalty, rejecting the appellant&#039;s plea for relief under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>