<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The satisfaction has to be recorded with objectivity and objective material and not in a mechanical manner- an analysis in view of law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Goenka Lime and Chemicals Ltd and related Judgments of High Courts, in relation to reassessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6610</link>
    <description>Recorded satisfaction required for initiating actions must reflect an independent application of mind and objective material; a mechanical or formulaic endorsement by a senior officer without stated reasons is invalid. In reassessment under section 148 the High Court quashed a notice where the JCIT simply recorded &quot;Yes, I am satisfied,&quot; and the Supreme Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that supervisory satisfaction must be reasoned and supported by material. Taxpayers should demand copies of recorded reasons and may challenge proceedings lacking such objective recorded satisfaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:38:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:38:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The satisfaction has to be recorded with objectivity and objective material and not in a mechanical manner- an analysis in view of law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Goenka Lime and Chemicals Ltd and related Judgments of High Courts, in relation to reassessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6610</link>
      <description>Recorded satisfaction required for initiating actions must reflect an independent application of mind and objective material; a mechanical or formulaic endorsement by a senior officer without stated reasons is invalid. In reassessment under section 148 the High Court quashed a notice where the JCIT simply recorded &quot;Yes, I am satisfied,&quot; and the Supreme Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that supervisory satisfaction must be reasoned and supported by material. Taxpayers should demand copies of recorded reasons and may challenge proceedings lacking such objective recorded satisfaction.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:38:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>