<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1364 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176960</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the market to market loss on forward exchange contracts as a deduction under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The ITAT concluded that the Assessee, following the mercantile system of accounting, was entitled to claim the loss even if the liability had not been discharged in the same year. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the allowance of the loss and citing relevant precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1364 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176960</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the market to market loss on forward exchange contracts as a deduction under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The ITAT concluded that the Assessee, following the mercantile system of accounting, was entitled to claim the loss even if the liability had not been discharged in the same year. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the allowance of the loss and citing relevant precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>