<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1747</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue in a penalty proceeding under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1998-99. The Court awaited a decision from a larger Bench on the necessity of explicit satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for penalty proceedings. Finding no explicit satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer, the Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1747</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue in a penalty proceeding under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1998-99. The Court awaited a decision from a larger Bench on the necessity of explicit satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for penalty proceedings. Finding no explicit satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer, the Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>