<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (12) TMI 36 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176948</link>
    <description>The proviso to section 13 was held inapplicable where the assessee regularly maintained accounts and the records were sufficient to deduce income; low profit or the absence of a stock register, by itself, did not justify rejection of the books and estimation of profits. For salary deductions, employee remuneration was treated as allowable if genuine and incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, and the taxing authority could not reduce it merely on a subjective view of reasonableness. On those principles, the salary disallowances were largely unsustainable, though the allowance component paid to the general manager remained disallowed on concession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (12) TMI 36 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176948</link>
      <description>The proviso to section 13 was held inapplicable where the assessee regularly maintained accounts and the records were sufficient to deduce income; low profit or the absence of a stock register, by itself, did not justify rejection of the books and estimation of profits. For salary deductions, employee remuneration was treated as allowable if genuine and incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, and the taxing authority could not reduce it merely on a subjective view of reasonableness. On those principles, the salary disallowances were largely unsustainable, though the allowance component paid to the general manager remained disallowed on concession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>