<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1042 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176929</link>
    <description>A statutory contribution to a parent marketing board for agricultural market development did not create a contractor-contractee relationship and was not consideration for professional or technical services; accordingly, no tax was deductible at source under sections 194C or 194J. The related demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was therefore not sustainable, and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:36:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1042 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176929</link>
      <description>A statutory contribution to a parent marketing board for agricultural market development did not create a contractor-contractee relationship and was not consideration for professional or technical services; accordingly, no tax was deductible at source under sections 194C or 194J. The related demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was therefore not sustainable, and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>