<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 726 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal regarding the validity of the claim for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) under section 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The dispute revolved around the interpretation of the six-month period for investment in NHAI bonds, with the Tribunal determining that the period ended on the date of allotment of bonds, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 726 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal regarding the validity of the claim for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) under section 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The dispute revolved around the interpretation of the six-month period for investment in NHAI bonds, with the Tribunal determining that the period ended on the date of allotment of bonds, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>