<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1475 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270171</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to release the detained goods upon the petitioner&#039;s payment of a one-time tax of Rs. 2,13,516. The petitioner was allowed to challenge the compounding fee separately through legal channels, with no costs imposed on either party, effectively resolving the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1475 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270171</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to release the detained goods upon the petitioner&#039;s payment of a one-time tax of Rs. 2,13,516. The petitioner was allowed to challenge the compounding fee separately through legal channels, with no costs imposed on either party, effectively resolving the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>