<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1335 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176912</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, condoned the 79-day delay in filing the appeal, and remitted the matter back to the Appellate Authority for consideration on merits and in accordance with the law. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:18:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1335 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176912</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, condoned the 79-day delay in filing the appeal, and remitted the matter back to the Appellate Authority for consideration on merits and in accordance with the law. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>