<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Disputed Due to Debate on Accounting Method for Project Profits by Tax Commissioner.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26676</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Considering one of the methods of accounting for determining the profits of the project adopted by the CIT (A) is not free from the debate or dispute. It is also a settled issue that when debate is an integral part of any addition, the concealment penalties will not survive. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 13:07:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 13:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Disputed Due to Debate on Accounting Method for Project Profits by Tax Commissioner.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26676</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Considering one of the methods of accounting for determining the profits of the project adopted by the CIT (A) is not free from the debate or dispute. It is also a settled issue that when debate is an integral part of any addition, the concealment penalties will not survive. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 13:07:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>