https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176826 The appeal was dismissed solely because the tax effect was negligible, and the Supreme Court declined to entertain the substantive legal question. No decision was rendered on the merits, and the question of law was expressly left open for future consideration. The order therefore has no adjudication on the underlying issue beyond the threshold-based dismissal. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176826 The appeal was dismissed solely because the tax effect was negligible, and the Supreme Court declined to entertain the substantive legal question. No decision was rendered on the merits, and the question of law was expressly left open for future consideration. The order therefore has no adjudication on the underlying issue beyond the threshold-based dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176826