<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1005 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes for A.Y. 2000-01 and A.Y. 2001-02, while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in both cases. Specific issues regarding marketing expenditure and depreciation on cellular phones and handsets were sent back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The judgment was pronounced on 22-09-2011, resolving the cross-appeals and directing fresh consideration of the identified issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1005 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes for A.Y. 2000-01 and A.Y. 2001-02, while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in both cases. Specific issues regarding marketing expenditure and depreciation on cellular phones and handsets were sent back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The judgment was pronounced on 22-09-2011, resolving the cross-appeals and directing fresh consideration of the identified issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>