<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1463 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, ruling that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income despite disallowed claims. The Tribunal emphasized that the claims were debatable and disclosed in the notes on accounts, following the precedent set in CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on September 16, 2015, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1463 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, ruling that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income despite disallowed claims. The Tribunal emphasized that the claims were debatable and disclosed in the notes on accounts, following the precedent set in CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on September 16, 2015, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>