<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1454 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the addition under section 69B of the Act, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. It found that the reference to the DVO without rejecting the books of account was improper, and the subsequent valuation report was deemed unreliable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting books of account before valuation references, aligning with legal precedents and the necessity for adherence to established principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1454 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the addition under section 69B of the Act, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. It found that the reference to the DVO without rejecting the books of account was improper, and the subsequent valuation report was deemed unreliable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting books of account before valuation references, aligning with legal precedents and the necessity for adherence to established principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>