https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270144 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty and rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The decision hinged on the interpretation that control passing to the hirer under the Rent-a-Cab scheme was pivotal in determining service tax liability. The Tribunal aligned with a recent judgment emphasizing this control aspect, overturning previous decisions cited by the Revenue. Ultimately, the judgment clarified the service tax liability for vehicle hiring under the Rent-a-Cab scheme, highlighting the significance of control transfer to the hirer as the decisive factor. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270144 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty and rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The decision hinged on the interpretation that control passing to the hirer under the Rent-a-Cab scheme was pivotal in determining service tax liability. The Tribunal aligned with a recent judgment emphasizing this control aspect, overturning previous decisions cited by the Revenue. Ultimately, the judgment clarified the service tax liability for vehicle hiring under the Rent-a-Cab scheme, highlighting the significance of control transfer to the hirer as the decisive factor. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270144