<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1443 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee, restoring them for further proceedings. It classified the products &quot;Primosa&quot; and &quot;Simrose&quot; under Heading No. 15159091 of CETA, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s classification under Chapter 30. Consequently, the demand of duty, interest, and penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority were set aside. The appeal by the Revenue for the enhancement of penalty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1443 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee, restoring them for further proceedings. It classified the products &quot;Primosa&quot; and &quot;Simrose&quot; under Heading No. 15159091 of CETA, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s classification under Chapter 30. Consequently, the demand of duty, interest, and penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority were set aside. The appeal by the Revenue for the enhancement of penalty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>