<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat Credit on the quantity of 150 MT used for the fabrication of capital goods. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant the right to claim credit on the specified quantity of items. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiated evidence and upheld the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat Credit based on the demonstrated usage of the items for the fabrication of capital goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat Credit on the quantity of 150 MT used for the fabrication of capital goods. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant the right to claim credit on the specified quantity of items. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiated evidence and upheld the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat Credit based on the demonstrated usage of the items for the fabrication of capital goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>