<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1437 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270133</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, upholding the penalty imposition of Rs. 25,000 each on both appellants for unauthorized importation of restricted items using an IE code. The presiding member found no grounds to reduce the penalties, considering the gravity of the offense and lack of mitigating factors. The appellants&#039; arguments of absence of mens rea were not accepted, and the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Cochin were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1437 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270133</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, upholding the penalty imposition of Rs. 25,000 each on both appellants for unauthorized importation of restricted items using an IE code. The presiding member found no grounds to reduce the penalties, considering the gravity of the offense and lack of mitigating factors. The appellants&#039; arguments of absence of mens rea were not accepted, and the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Cochin were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>