https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270127 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that disputed factual issues should be addressed through the statutory appeal remedy under the Customs Act. The Petitioner was advised to pursue an appeal before the CESTAT as provided in Section 129A of the Act, as the court lacked jurisdiction to decide factual matters. The court highlighted the importance of exhausting alternative appellate remedies and closed the related miscellaneous petition. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270127 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that disputed factual issues should be addressed through the statutory appeal remedy under the Customs Act. The Petitioner was advised to pursue an appeal before the CESTAT as provided in Section 129A of the Act, as the court lacked jurisdiction to decide factual matters. The court highlighted the importance of exhausting alternative appellate remedies and closed the related miscellaneous petition. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270127