https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270122 The Court found that the respondent had not considered the petitioner's detailed objections before passing the impugned orders, leading to discrepancies. Consequently, the Court quashed the orders dated 27.02.2015 and remitted the matters back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to reevaluate the objections, provide a new opportunity for a personal hearing, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 18:36:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270122 The Court found that the respondent had not considered the petitioner's detailed objections before passing the impugned orders, leading to discrepancies. Consequently, the Court quashed the orders dated 27.02.2015 and remitted the matters back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to reevaluate the objections, provide a new opportunity for a personal hearing, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270122