https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176815 The High Court has the authority to quash a process or charge under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to prevent abuse of court processes or secure justice. Section 17 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act applies to directors, and orders framing charges are deemed interlocutory. The High Court's inherent powers under section 482 can be used to prevent abuse of court processes, even if it involves quashing interlocutory orders. Section 397(2) does not restrict the High Court's inherent powers. en-us Wed, 09 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:09:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176815 The High Court has the authority to quash a process or charge under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to prevent abuse of court processes or secure justice. Section 17 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act applies to directors, and orders framing charges are deemed interlocutory. The High Court's inherent powers under section 482 can be used to prevent abuse of court processes, even if it involves quashing interlocutory orders. Section 397(2) does not restrict the High Court's inherent powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176815