<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (2) TMI 129 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176815</link>
    <description>An order framing charge or issuing process is interlocutory because it only formulates the accusation and does not finally determine the parties&#039; rights or terminate the criminal proceeding. The bar on revision against interlocutory orders under section 397(2) does not, by itself, oust the High Court&#039;s separate inherent power under section 482, which may still be used in an appropriate case to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to keeping subordinate courts within jurisdiction and cannot ordinarily be invoked to reappraise or interfere with such threshold criminal orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (2) TMI 129 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176815</link>
      <description>An order framing charge or issuing process is interlocutory because it only formulates the accusation and does not finally determine the parties&#039; rights or terminate the criminal proceeding. The bar on revision against interlocutory orders under section 397(2) does not, by itself, oust the High Court&#039;s separate inherent power under section 482, which may still be used in an appropriate case to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to keeping subordinate courts within jurisdiction and cannot ordinarily be invoked to reappraise or interfere with such threshold criminal orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>