https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176813 A bank deposit ordinarily creates a debtor-creditor relationship, so a bank manager's refusal to repay a fixed deposit, without proof of dishonest withdrawal or personal misappropriation, does not satisfy the ingredients of criminal breach of trust under Section 409 IPC. The text also states that a prejudicial revisional order under Section 401(2) CrPC, as extended by Section 399, cannot be made without notice to the accused and an opportunity of hearing; an order passed after hearing only the complainant is procedurally invalid. On these principles, the criminal proceedings described could not be sustained. en-us Fri, 12 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176813 A bank deposit ordinarily creates a debtor-creditor relationship, so a bank manager's refusal to repay a fixed deposit, without proof of dishonest withdrawal or personal misappropriation, does not satisfy the ingredients of criminal breach of trust under Section 409 IPC. The text also states that a prejudicial revisional order under Section 401(2) CrPC, as extended by Section 399, cannot be made without notice to the accused and an opportunity of hearing; an order passed after hearing only the complainant is procedurally invalid. On these principles, the criminal proceedings described could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176813