https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176813 The case involved a petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge summoning a bank manager for misappropriation of funds under S. 408 of the Penal Code. The judge revised the order of dismissal of the complaint, emphasizing the legal relationship between a bank and its customer as creditor-debtor. A discrepancy arose regarding the intended section for summoning the accused. The judgment highlighted the necessity of issuing notice to the accused in a revision petition, stressing adherence to due process in legal proceedings. en-us Fri, 12 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176813 The case involved a petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge summoning a bank manager for misappropriation of funds under S. 408 of the Penal Code. The judge revised the order of dismissal of the complaint, emphasizing the legal relationship between a bank and its customer as creditor-debtor. A discrepancy arose regarding the intended section for summoning the accused. The judgment highlighted the necessity of issuing notice to the accused in a revision petition, stressing adherence to due process in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176813