<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 196 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176812</link>
    <description>Clause 20(3) of the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1976 did not create automatic absorption of erstwhile contract carriage employees into the Corporation&#039;s service. Absorption depended on satisfaction of statutory conditions, including workman status, exclusive employment in connection with the acquired property, prescribed ratio, willingness to join, and completion of screening, equation of posts, and seniority determination. Until those steps were completed, the employees had only an expectation, not an accrued or vested right. The later Act&#039;s saving clause preserved only acts done under the Ordinance, while the retrospective statutory scheme displaced the earlier ratio and governed absorption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 196 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176812</link>
      <description>Clause 20(3) of the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1976 did not create automatic absorption of erstwhile contract carriage employees into the Corporation&#039;s service. Absorption depended on satisfaction of statutory conditions, including workman status, exclusive employment in connection with the acquired property, prescribed ratio, willingness to join, and completion of screening, equation of posts, and seniority determination. Until those steps were completed, the employees had only an expectation, not an accrued or vested right. The later Act&#039;s saving clause preserved only acts done under the Ordinance, while the retrospective statutory scheme displaced the earlier ratio and governed absorption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>