<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 948 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176803</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal on September 4, 2009. It directed the AO to allow deduction under section 80-IA on an undertaking-wise basis, rejecting the aggregation of profits from different units. The issue of disallowance of provision for leave encashment was deferred for the appellant to seek redressal from the assessing authority within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:54:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 948 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176803</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal on September 4, 2009. It directed the AO to allow deduction under section 80-IA on an undertaking-wise basis, rejecting the aggregation of profits from different units. The issue of disallowance of provision for leave encashment was deferred for the appellant to seek redressal from the assessing authority within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>