<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 706 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176799</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court determined that the common object of the unlawful assembly was to cause grievous hurt, not murder. As a result, the convictions and sentences of the accused were modified, with A-1 and A-2 receiving five years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine under Section 326/149 IPC. A-5 was acquitted of all charges due to unreliable evidence against them. The Court emphasized the importance of consistent and corroborated evidence in reaching its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 706 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176799</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court determined that the common object of the unlawful assembly was to cause grievous hurt, not murder. As a result, the convictions and sentences of the accused were modified, with A-1 and A-2 receiving five years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine under Section 326/149 IPC. A-5 was acquitted of all charges due to unreliable evidence against them. The Court emphasized the importance of consistent and corroborated evidence in reaching its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>