<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1154 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176795</link>
    <description>Inherent power under Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, and not to assess whether the prosecution will end in conviction. Quashing is justified only if the complaint and supporting materials, even on their face, do not disclose an offence, are barred by law, or are otherwise frivolous, vexatious, or oppressive. On the FIR, charge-sheet, and witness statements, the materials disclosed specific allegations of motive, conspiracy, communication among the accused, and overt acts linking them to the alleged attack; the prosecution was therefore not lacking in a prima facie case, and quashing was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1154 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176795</link>
      <description>Inherent power under Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, and not to assess whether the prosecution will end in conviction. Quashing is justified only if the complaint and supporting materials, even on their face, do not disclose an offence, are barred by law, or are otherwise frivolous, vexatious, or oppressive. On the FIR, charge-sheet, and witness statements, the materials disclosed specific allegations of motive, conspiracy, communication among the accused, and overt acts linking them to the alleged attack; the prosecution was therefore not lacking in a prima facie case, and quashing was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>