<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1154 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176795</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the High Court&#039;s order that quashed the criminal proceedings against Respondent Nos. 1-3. The Supreme Court held that there was sufficient evidence on record to proceed with the trial, emphasizing that the High Court had exceeded its power in quashing the proceedings. The Court directed the trial court to continue with the case against Respondent Nos. 1-3 in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1154 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176795</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the High Court&#039;s order that quashed the criminal proceedings against Respondent Nos. 1-3. The Supreme Court held that there was sufficient evidence on record to proceed with the trial, emphasizing that the High Court had exceeded its power in quashing the proceedings. The Court directed the trial court to continue with the case against Respondent Nos. 1-3 in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>