<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Importing Without IE Code Risks Confiscation; Penalty u/s 112 May Not Be Essential for Code Absence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26657</link>
    <description>Import of goods without having the IE Code at the time of importation - No doubt penalty can be imposed for rendering the goods liable to confiscation. - But, for the only offence of not having the IE Code at the time of importation, imposing penalty under Section 112 may not be necessary - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 02:54:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 02:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Importing Without IE Code Risks Confiscation; Penalty u/s 112 May Not Be Essential for Code Absence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26657</link>
      <description>Import of goods without having the IE Code at the time of importation - No doubt penalty can be imposed for rendering the goods liable to confiscation. - But, for the only offence of not having the IE Code at the time of importation, imposing penalty under Section 112 may not be necessary - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 02:54:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>