<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1420 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270116</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in dismissing the addition made under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act for unclaimed &#039;stale drafts and pay orders&#039;, ruling that the amount did not constitute taxable profit. Additionally, the Court affirmed the assessee&#039;s right to claim depreciation on investments in government securities &quot;held to maturity&quot; based on consistent accounting practices, supported by Supreme Court precedents. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 01:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1420 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270116</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in dismissing the addition made under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act for unclaimed &#039;stale drafts and pay orders&#039;, ruling that the amount did not constitute taxable profit. Additionally, the Court affirmed the assessee&#039;s right to claim depreciation on investments in government securities &quot;held to maturity&quot; based on consistent accounting practices, supported by Supreme Court precedents. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>