https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270096 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the setting aside of the order confirming demand of ineligible credit. The appeal was based on the contention that the duty paid by the supplier was not Central Excise duty. The Tribunal upheld the duty discharge by the supplier, rendering the Revenue's argument to deny credit invalid. The CENVAT credit taken by the respondent was validated based on the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the significance of the upheld duty discharge by the supplier in determining the correctness of the credit availed. en-us Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270096 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the setting aside of the order confirming demand of ineligible credit. The appeal was based on the contention that the duty paid by the supplier was not Central Excise duty. The Tribunal upheld the duty discharge by the supplier, rendering the Revenue's argument to deny credit invalid. The CENVAT credit taken by the respondent was validated based on the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the significance of the upheld duty discharge by the supplier in determining the correctness of the credit availed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270096