<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1398 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270094</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld penalties on individuals directly involved in an excise duty evasion scheme, such as Shri A.R. Majmudar and Smt. A.A. Majmudar, while setting aside penalties on dummy units M/s Pocono and M/s Shonar. The tribunal justified penalties under Rule 209A for those knowingly participating in irregular activities, varying outcomes based on individual roles. Penalties on M/s Pocono and M/s Shonar were annulled, but penalties on Mr. A.R. Majmudar as Director of M/s Bakul were upheld, with a reduction for Smt. A.A. Majmudar, reflecting a nuanced approach based on individual involvement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1398 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270094</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld penalties on individuals directly involved in an excise duty evasion scheme, such as Shri A.R. Majmudar and Smt. A.A. Majmudar, while setting aside penalties on dummy units M/s Pocono and M/s Shonar. The tribunal justified penalties under Rule 209A for those knowingly participating in irregular activities, varying outcomes based on individual roles. Penalties on M/s Pocono and M/s Shonar were annulled, but penalties on Mr. A.R. Majmudar as Director of M/s Bakul were upheld, with a reduction for Smt. A.A. Majmudar, reflecting a nuanced approach based on individual involvement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>