<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1392 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the activity of installing signaling systems did not constitute manufacturing excisable goods subject to excise duty. Additionally, the Tribunal found the demand raised in the show cause notice to be time-barred, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit requirements and a stay on the recovery process for duty, interest, and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1392 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the activity of installing signaling systems did not constitute manufacturing excisable goods subject to excise duty. Additionally, the Tribunal found the demand raised in the show cause notice to be time-barred, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit requirements and a stay on the recovery process for duty, interest, and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>