https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270087 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for denovo adjudication. The Commissioner was instructed to examine the appellant's claims regarding the classification of input services, the reversal of Cenvat credit, and the applicability of Rule 6(3). The Commissioner was also directed to consider the quantification of demand, the question of limitation, and the imposition of penalties during the denovo proceedings. en-us Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270087 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for denovo adjudication. The Commissioner was instructed to examine the appellant's claims regarding the classification of input services, the reversal of Cenvat credit, and the applicability of Rule 6(3). The Commissioner was also directed to consider the quantification of demand, the question of limitation, and the imposition of penalties during the denovo proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270087