<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1678 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176774</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed the condonation of delay application in filing an appeal due to an employee leaving the job. The Tribunal found that the reasons provided by the applicant were not sufficient to justify the delay of 109 days in filing the appeal. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that delays caused by employees&#039; negligence or departure from the job were not acceptable grounds for condonation. As a result, the Tribunal rejected the application and disposed of the appeal along with the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1678 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176774</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed the condonation of delay application in filing an appeal due to an employee leaving the job. The Tribunal found that the reasons provided by the applicant were not sufficient to justify the delay of 109 days in filing the appeal. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that delays caused by employees&#039; negligence or departure from the job were not acceptable grounds for condonation. As a result, the Tribunal rejected the application and disposed of the appeal along with the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>