<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1107 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176783</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the export of services for tax purposes. The Tribunal found that the services provided, which involved research and development activities for a US-based biopharmaceutical company, constituted export of services as they were partly performed abroad upon acceptance by clients overseas. Citing relevant legal precedents, including past decisions and the Export of Service Rules, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1107 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176783</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the export of services for tax purposes. The Tribunal found that the services provided, which involved research and development activities for a US-based biopharmaceutical company, constituted export of services as they were partly performed abroad upon acceptance by clients overseas. Citing relevant legal precedents, including past decisions and the Export of Service Rules, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>