https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176784 The appeal was filed against a service tax demand confirmed for a specific period, relating to Real Estate Agent services. The adjudicating authority upheld the demand, including the cost of land in the assessable value due to lack of separate evidence. The service provided was deemed to fall under Real Estate Agent services, even if the land was agricultural. The Tribunal ordered a pre-deposit of 25% of the tax liability with interest, pending compliance within a set timeframe. Recovery of the remaining liability was stayed pending appeal upon compliance. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176784 The appeal was filed against a service tax demand confirmed for a specific period, relating to Real Estate Agent services. The adjudicating authority upheld the demand, including the cost of land in the assessable value due to lack of separate evidence. The service provided was deemed to fall under Real Estate Agent services, even if the land was agricultural. The Tribunal ordered a pre-deposit of 25% of the tax liability with interest, pending compliance within a set timeframe. Recovery of the remaining liability was stayed pending appeal upon compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176784