<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1037 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 on a manufacturer of diagnostic kits for service tax liability on overseas commission payments. The Tribunal found no active concealment or contumacious conduct by the appellant, as the tax was promptly paid upon notification and transactions were recorded in the ordinary course of business. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, relieving them from the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1037 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 on a manufacturer of diagnostic kits for service tax liability on overseas commission payments. The Tribunal found no active concealment or contumacious conduct by the appellant, as the tax was promptly paid upon notification and transactions were recorded in the ordinary course of business. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, relieving them from the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>